Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary, 2,000 Mules, raises serious questions about possible skullduggery in the 2020 election, involving absentee ballots across multiple states. But neither the liberal media, nor election officials, nor law enforcement seem to have much interest in investigating that potential wrongdoing. The reaction has largely boiled down to “nothing to see here!” or else to so-called “fact checks” that criticize the technology used to analyze the problems the film documents, rather than actually use the information D’Souza presents to investigate the credibility of the claims being made.
Read More: The Fraud that Dare Not Speak its Name
Von Spakovsky: The Fraud that Dare Not Speak its Name
Hans von Spakovsky
June 2, 2022
Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary, 2,000 Mules, raises serious questions about possible skullduggery in the 2020 election, involving absentee ballots across multiple states. But neither the liberal media, nor election officials, nor law enforcement seem to have much interest in investigating that potential wrongdoing. The reaction has largely boiled down to “nothing to see here!” or else to so-called “fact checks” that criticize the technology used to analyze the problems the film documents, rather than actually use the information D’Souza presents to investigate the credibility of the claims being made.
Read More: The Fraud that Dare Not Speak its Name
JOIN THE COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND
By joining the Committee to Support and Defend, you will be directly supporting our active-duty servicemembers, their families and our treasured veterans.
Related articles
Resistance is Futile…and Stupid
Constitutional Governance
Cleanup on Aisle 7